From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Oct 29, 2012
Case No. 3:00cr12/LAC (N.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:00cr12/LAC Case No. 3:12cv436/LAC/EMT

10-29-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD BRUCE KING


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 19, 2012 (doc. 509). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 507) is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

_________________

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Oct 29, 2012
Case No. 3:00cr12/LAC (N.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. King

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD BRUCE KING

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 29, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:00cr12/LAC (N.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Anderson

It did not pronounce a "newly recognized" constitutional right. See Sluder v. United States, Nos.…

Croxford v. United States

Southern Union, 132 S.Ct. at 2349 (addressing statutory criminal fines under the Resource Conservation and…