From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bundy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 22, 2014
Case No. 2:12-cv-0804-LDG-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 22, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-0804-LDG-GWF

04-22-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CLIVEN BUNDY, Defendant.


ORDER

On April 16, 2014, Michael Joseph Kearns filed a self-styled "Emergency Intervention of Necessity to Protect the Land and People of the United States." (#42) The Ninth Circuit requires an applicant for intervention as of right under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) to demonstrate that

(1) it has a significant protectable interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action, (2) the disposition of the action may, as a practical matter, impair or impede the applicant's ability to protect its interest, (3) the application is timely, and (4) the existing parties may not adequately represent the applicant's interests.
Chamness v. Bowen, 722 F.3d 1110, 1121 (9th Cir. 2013).

Applicant Kearns has failed to meet these requirements. Defendant Bundy filed an appeal on August 9, 2013 (#37) from the order and judgment of this court entered on July 9, 2013 (#35 and #36). An appeal to the Ninth Circuit divests this court of jurisdiction over a motion to intervene, see Assoc. General Contractors of California v. Secretary of Commerce, 77 F.R.D. 31, 35 (C.D. Cal. 1977), and the Ninth Circuit has dismissed Bundy's notice of appeal (#41). Kearns' filing, therefore, is not only untimely, but the court has no jurisdiction to grant it.

Even if the court had jurisdiction, Kearns' filing demonstrates no protectable interest that is the subject of this litigation, the disposition of which may impede or impair Kearns' asserted interest. Kearns claims a right as one of the free sovereign and independent people of the United States to represent the interests of the United States and remove this case to the Supreme Court for independent action. No such status or right exists.

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that Kearns' "Emergency Intervention of Necessity to Protect the Land and People of the United States" (#42) is DENIED.

__________

Lloyd D. George

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Bundy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 22, 2014
Case No. 2:12-cv-0804-LDG-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 22, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Bundy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CLIVEN BUNDY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-0804-LDG-GWF (D. Nev. Apr. 22, 2014)