From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tringali v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 9, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Theresa Tringali testified at trial that she had lost one week of school following the motor vehicle accident, and that she experienced pain in her knees once or twice a day in the course of her full-time job on her feet as a drug store cashier. X rays revealed no abnormal findings, and Tringali's physician admitted that his client could engage in any activity, including skiing, after conditioning exercises. In view of the absence of any objective evidence of serious injury, coupled with the facts that Tringali's pain is not persistent but intermittent, and that she enjoys a full range of motion and activity, the court properly dismissed her complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case of "serious injury" as statutorily defined (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 237). Tringali's intermittent complaints of pain, without more, will not suffice to satisfy the standards for a "serious injury" under the No-Fault Insurance Law (see, Scheer v. Koubek, 70 N.Y.2d 678; Stadier v. Findley, 148 A.D.2d 600). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tringali v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Tringali v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:THERESA TRINGALI, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, PEARL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 804