From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stadier v. Findley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1989
148 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

March 20, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hand, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, her deposition testimony to the effect that she suffers intermittent pain in the shoulder and neck as a result of the accident, in conjunction with a previous medical diagnosis of "cervical radiculitis", is insufficient to establish a prima facie case of serious injury which requires a showing that she suffered permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Scheer v. Koubek, 70 N.Y.2d 678; Popp v Kremer, 124 A.D.2d 720; cf., Mooney v. Ovitt, 100 A.D.2d 702). Thus, the defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Brown, J.P., Eiber, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stadier v. Findley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1989
148 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Stadier v. Findley

Case Details

Full title:CLAIRE D. STADIER, Respondent, v. SCOTT T. FINDLEY et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1989

Citations

148 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Tringali v. County of Suffolk

X rays revealed no abnormal findings, and Tringali's physician admitted that his client could engage in any…

Taylor v. George Hildebrandt Inc.

It is apparent that the plaintiffs suffered nothing more than sprains and strains as a result of the accident…