From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tooley v. Howard Johnson's Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 18, 1968
29 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

April 18, 1968


Order entered September 18, 1967, herein appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants and the motion denied. The accident upon which the action for damages is based occurred in 1960. The case was noticed for trial in the Civil Court in 1964. Plaintiff allegedly discovered the claimed enlargement of injuries, the predicate for the motion to amend and to transfer, in May, 1966, but took no action for approximately 12 months thereafter. No reasonable excuse is offered for the delay ( Koi v. P.S. M. Catering Corp., 15 A.D.2d 775; Kind v. Serebreny Corp., 28 A.D.2d 988; de los Reyes v. United States Lines Co., 28 A.D.2d 991). Additionally, there is no affidavit of merits and there is insufficient to show a causal connection between the accident and the extensive injuries now asserted.

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Eager, Steuer, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Tooley v. Howard Johnson's Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 18, 1968
29 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Tooley v. Howard Johnson's Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD TOOLEY, Respondent, v. HOWARD JOHNSON'S INCORPORATED et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Schiffman v. Meir

The plaintiff must also provide a physician's affidavit demonstrating with some degree of specificity the…

Lovette v. Glassman

The medical proof, moreover, fails to demonstrate that the $25,000 originally sought is inadequate to cover…