From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kind v. Rose Serebreny Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1967
28 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

October 24, 1967


Order, entered on January 17, 1967, unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of denying that portion of plaintiffs' motion which sought leave to increase their ad damnum clause, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The medical proof submitted is insufficient to establish that the amount originally sought is not adequate to cover the injuries and damages sustained and no reasonable excuse is offered for the extended delay in moving to amend. Plaintiffs are chargeable with inordinate laches sufficient to bar the relief sought. ( Koi v. P.S. M. Catering Corp., 15 A.D.2d 775.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Stevens, Capozzoli and McGivern, JJ.


Summaries of

Kind v. Rose Serebreny Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1967
28 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Kind v. Rose Serebreny Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET KIND et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. ROSE SEREBRENY CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Wyman v. Morone

Where, as here, no excuse is offered for the extended delay in moving to amend, the courts have consistently…

Tooley v. Howard Johnson's Incorporated

Plaintiff allegedly discovered the claimed enlargement of injuries, the predicate for the motion to amend and…