From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Ives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 30, 2015
No. ED CV 14-1726-JGB (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2015)

Summary

holding that court lacked jurisdiction to consider petitioner's challenge to BOP's particularized decision regarding his RRC placement

Summary of this case from Bristow v. Johnson

Opinion

No. ED CV 14-1726-JGB (PLA)

01-30-2015

DONZELL THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. RICHARD IVES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation is accepted.

2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted.

3. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

4. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record. DATED: January 30, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thompson v. Ives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 30, 2015
No. ED CV 14-1726-JGB (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2015)

holding that court lacked jurisdiction to consider petitioner's challenge to BOP's particularized decision regarding his RRC placement

Summary of this case from Bristow v. Johnson

holding that court lacked jurisdiction to consider petitioner's challenge to BOP's particularized decision regarding his RRC placement

Summary of this case from Bristow v. Johnson
Case details for

Thompson v. Ives

Case Details

Full title:DONZELL THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. RICHARD IVES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 30, 2015

Citations

No. ED CV 14-1726-JGB (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2015)

Citing Cases

Gullett v. Salas

As such, the Court lacks jurisdiction to review Petitioner's claim challenging the BOP's individualized…

Ex Parte Mason

J. P. Mudd, of Birmingham, for appellee. The judgment against the tenant binds the landlord also. Code 1923,…