From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 30, 1992
179 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 30, 1992

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Lyons, J.).


On September 9, 1985 the State appropriated claimants' property, consisting of 35.011 acres located at the base of Belleayre Mountain in the Village of Pine Hill, Ulster County. Claimants thereafter filed a claim in the Court of Claims, which, following trial, awarded claimants damages. Claimants then moved for an additional allowance to reimburse their actual and necessary expenditures in litigating the claim. Applying EDPL 701, as amended by the Laws of 1987 (ch 771, § 1, eff Aug. 7, 1987), the Court of Claims awarded claimants $64,868.75 in counsel fees and $6,436.07 in appraisers' fees. The State appeals from the additional judgment entered thereon.

There should be an affirmance. The State's initial prelitigation offer was $92,000. At the trial, however, the State offered proof that the appropriated property had a value of $175,000. The Court of Claims determined that claimants were entitled to $255,000. Because the trial court's award was substantially in excess of the prelitigation offer (see, EDPL 701; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. [Superior Reed Rattan Furniture Co.], 160 A.D.2d 705, 709-710; see also, Lee-Hi Fuel Corp. v. State of New York, 179 A.D.2d 494), and the additional award was necessary to achieve just and adequate compensation (cf., Frisbro Enters. v. State of New York, 145 Misc.2d 397, 398-399; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. [Gun Hill Bus Depot], 142 Misc.2d 629, 634-635), the Court of Claims properly exercised its discretion in awarding claimants an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL 701.

In addition, the Court of Claims properly applied the amendment to EDPL 701 (see, Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. [Superior Reed Rattan Furniture Co.], supra, at 707-709; see also, Lee-Hi Fuel Corp. v. State of New York, supra; Matter of City of New York [Long Is. Sound Realty Co.], 160 A.D.2d 696, 697; Town of Esopus v. Gordon, 143 Misc.2d 193, 194-195, affd 162 A.D.2d 829, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 801). Given that EDPL former 701 already provided for the recovery of certain litigation expenses, the amended version did not establish a new right. Rather, it merely broadened the existing remedy and, accordingly, may be considered a remedial statute (see, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 54 [a]; Matter of City of New York [Long Is. Sound Realty Co.], supra; see also, Coffman v. Coffman, 60 A.D.2d 181, 188). As such, the amended version of EDPL 701 is applicable to claimants' motion.

Levine, Crew III, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the additional judgment is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 30, 1992
179 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL THOMAS et al., Respondents, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
579 N.Y.S.2d 760

Citing Cases

Walsh v. State of New York

The State's remaining points do not require extended discussion. Our previous holding in Thomas v. State of…

Taylor v. State of New York

laim for an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL 701, but rather a claim for a higher rate of interest which…