From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Com

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Jun 14, 2005
45 Va. App. 811 (Va. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

adopting the opinion of the panel

Summary of this case from Mayfield v. Commonwealth

Opinion

Record No. 2889-03-4.

June 14, 2005.

Steven A. Merril (Laura P. Leibowitz; Whitestone, Brent, Young Merril, P.C., on brief), Fairfax, for appellant.

Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (Judith Williams Jadgmann, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Before: FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, ELDER, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS, FELTON, KELSEY, McCLANAHAN and HALEY, JJ.


Upon Rehearing En Banc

By published opinion dated January 25, 2005, a panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc. Upon reconsideration, the stay of this Court's January 25, 2005 mandate is lifted and we affirm the trial court for the reasons stated in the majority opinion in Thomas v. Commonwealth, 44 Va.App. 741, 607 S.E.2d 738 (2005), and adopt that opinion as our own.

Judges Benton, Elder, and Clements would reverse the trial court for the reasons set forth in the panel dissenting opinion. Chief Judge Fitzpatrick agrees with the dissent that the trial court erred in allowing the disputed evidence. However, she would hold that the other evidence of guilt is overwhelming and, thus, the error could not have affected the verdict.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Com

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Jun 14, 2005
45 Va. App. 811 (Va. Ct. App. 2005)

adopting the opinion of the panel

Summary of this case from Mayfield v. Commonwealth

defining "relevant evidence" as "evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact in issue more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence"

Summary of this case from Cipolla v. Commonwealth

noting that an objection "must be both specific and timely — so that the trial judge would know the particular point being made in time to do something about it"

Summary of this case from Christovich v. Christovich

describing role of "evidentiary" or "basic" facts

Summary of this case from Cooper v. Com

explaining that the objection "must be both specific and timely"

Summary of this case from McDowell v. Commonwealth, 0510-08-2 Unpublished

noting expert opinion that empty "plastic baggies" are "commonly used in the drug trade for distribution purposes"

Summary of this case from Boone v. Commonwealth
Case details for

Thomas v. Com

Case Details

Full title:Raymond Brian THOMAS, Sr., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Jun 14, 2005

Citations

45 Va. App. 811 (Va. Ct. App. 2005)
613 S.E.2d 870

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Blowe

Significantly, "[i]t is its tendency to prove or disprove—not its sufficiency, standing alone, to satisfy the…

Younger v. Commonwealth

"The purpose of Rule 5A:18 is 'to ensure that the trial court and opposing party are given the opportunity to…