From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tannen v. Tannen

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 8, 2011
208 N.J. 409 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-8

Mark TANNEN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Wendy TANNEN, Defendant–Respondent, v. Wendy Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, Leonard J. Phillips and Gloria Phillips, as trustees, Phillips Family Dynasty Trust, Wendy G. Tannen and Robert A. Bertha, CPA, as trustees, Blake Gordon Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, and Elizabeth Rose Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, Third–Party Defendants–Respondents.Mark Tannen, Plaintiff–Respondent and Cross–Appellant, v. Wendy Tannen, Defendant, v. Wendy Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, Leonard J. Phillips and Gloria Phillips, as trustees, Phillips Family Dynasty Trust, Wendy G. Tannen and Robert A. Bertha, CPA, as trustees, Blake Gordon Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, and Elizabeth Rose Tannen Trust, Wendy G. Tannen, as trustee, Third–Party Defendants–Appellants.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 416 N.J.Super. 248 (2010).Edward S. Snyder argued the cause for appellant (Snyder & Sarno, attorneys; Mr. Snyder and Tracey Alfano on the brief). Jay J. Rice argued the cause for respondents Wendy Tannen Trust, et al. (Nagel Rice, attorneys; Mr. Rice and Randee M. Matloff, Roseland, on the briefs).


On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 416 N.J.Super. 248 (2010).Edward S. Snyder argued the cause for appellant (Snyder & Sarno, attorneys; Mr. Snyder and Tracey Alfano on the brief). Jay J. Rice argued the cause for respondents Wendy Tannen Trust, et al. (Nagel Rice, attorneys; Mr. Rice and Randee M. Matloff, Roseland, on the briefs). Shelley D. Albert argued the cause for respondent Wendy Tannen (Dario Yacker Suarez & Albert, attorneys).Glenn A. Henkel, Haddonfield, argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey State Bar Association (Richard H. Steen, President, attorney; Mr. Steen, of counsel; Mr. Henkel, Martin L. Bearg, Livingston, Lawrence A. Friedman, Bridgewater, Richard H. Greenberg, Woodbridge, Stephanie F. Hagan, Morristown, Richard Kahn, Florham Park, Jeralyn L. Lawrence, Bridgewater, Daniel M. Serviss, Roseland, and Thomas J. Snyder, Denville, on the brief).PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Messano's opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 416 N.J.Super. 248, 3 A.3d 1229 (2010).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER, and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, and PATTERSON—6.

Opposed—None.

Not Participating—Judge WEFING (temporarily assigned)—1.


Summaries of

Tannen v. Tannen

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 8, 2011
208 N.J. 409 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

Tannen v. Tannen

Case Details

Full title:Mark TANNEN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Wendy TANNEN, Defendant–Respondent…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Dec 8, 2011

Citations

208 N.J. 409 (N.J. 2011)
31 A.3d 621

Citing Cases

Zamorsky v. Zamorsky

Tannen v. Tannen, 416 N.J. Super. 248, 281 (App. Div. 2010) (quoting Painter v. Painter, 65 N.J. 196, 216…

Wicker v. Wicker

Tannen v. Tannen, 416 N.J. Super. 248, 260 (App. Div. 2010) (quoting Steneken v. Steneken, 183 N.J. 290, 299…