From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sulaiman Corp. v. Asian American Food Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 2001
285 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted June 6, 2001.

July 9, 2001.

In an action, inter alia, to rescind the purchase of a business based on fraudulent inducement, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated August 22, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendants Asian American Food Corp. and Anil Bhantia pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7) to dismiss the plaintiffs' first cause of action alleging fraudulent inducement.

Finkel Goldstein Berzow Rosenbloom Nash, LLP, New York, N Y (Kevin J. Nash of counsel), for appellants.

Joseph Fallek, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Andrew M. Fallek of counsel), for respondents Asian American Food Corp. and Anil Bhantia.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The statements in the plaintiffs complaint and the parties' contract negate the plaintiffs' claim that they reasonably relied upon the alleged oral misrepresentations of the defendant Anil Bhantia (see, Stone v. Schulz, 231 A.D.2d 707). Accordingly, they failed to state a cause of action sounding in fraudulent inducement (see, Stone v. Schulz, supra).

O'BRIEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sulaiman Corp. v. Asian American Food Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 2001
285 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Sulaiman Corp. v. Asian American Food Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SULAIMAN CORP. T/A COTILLION CATERERS, ET AL., appellants, v. ASIAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 9, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 652

Citing Cases

PUGACH v. HBO PICTURES, INC.

Due to this meaningful conflict between the alleged oral misrepresentation and the particular provisions of…

Old Clinton Corp. v. 502 Old Country Road

However, the contract contains a provision that indicates, in effect, that a 7,000 square-foot building could…