From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stewart v. Roosevelt Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1964
22 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

October 8, 1964


Order, entered on December 28, 1962, denying motion for discovery and inspection, unanimously reversed on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted. Plaintiff sought discovery of the ambulance records and an accident report made by an employee of defendant. The ambulance records are part of the records regularly kept by the defendant. As to the accident report, the proper procedure was followed by plaintiff ( Rios v. Donovan, 21 A.D.2d 409). It does not appear that the report was attorney's work product or defense material.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Stewart v. Roosevelt Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1964
22 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Stewart v. Roosevelt Hospital

Case Details

Full title:HARRIET V. STEWART, as Administratrix of the Estate of PHILLIP E. STEWART…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 8, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.

Whether an internal business report is designed for use in litigation may be a close question (Supplementary…

Post v. Great Eastern Management Corp.

Thus they are documents prepared for defendant in the regular course of its business (Weisgold v Kiamesha…