From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1
Nov 1, 2021
No. 82564-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2021)

Opinion

82564-0-I

11-01-2021

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MICAH PATLAN SNYDER, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM

Micah Snyder appeals his convictions for two counts of third degree domestic violence assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the portion of his judgment and sentence ordering him to provide a DNA sample should be stricken because he had already provided a sample pursuant to prior felony convictions. RCW 43.43.754(4) ("If the Washington state patrol crime laboratory already has a DNA sample from an individual for a qualifying offense, a subsequent submission is not required to be submitted."); State v. Houck, 9 Wn.App. 2d 636, 651 n.4, 446 P.3d 646 (2019); State v. Van Wolvelaere, 8 Wn.App. 2d 705, 710, 440 P.3d 1005 (2019).

Deoxyribonucleic acid.Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material.

We accept the State's concession and remand to the trial court for a ministerial order striking the order to submit a DNA sample.

Remanded with instructions.


Summaries of

State v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1
Nov 1, 2021
No. 82564-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MICAH PATLAN SNYDER, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1

Date published: Nov 1, 2021

Citations

No. 82564-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2021)