From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Quick

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 3, 2002
356 N.C. 311 (N.C. 2002)

Opinion


570 S.E.2d 896 (N.C. 2002) 356 N.C. 311 STATE of North Carolina v. William Lamonte QUICK. No. 457P02. Supreme Court of North Carolina October 3, 2002.

        Lemuel W. Hinton, Raleigh, for Quick.

        Charles J. Murray, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

        Prior report: 152 N.C.App. 220, 566 S.E.2d 735.

        ORDER

        Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of October 2002."

        Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of October 2002."


Summaries of

State v. Quick

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 3, 2002
356 N.C. 311 (N.C. 2002)
Case details for

State v. Quick

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. William Lamonte QUICK.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 3, 2002

Citations

356 N.C. 311 (N.C. 2002)
356 N.C. 311

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

Further, once the coercive influence is removed, the "defendant ha[s] a duty to surrender himself and the…

State v. Wheeler

Furthermore, the trial court is not required to make specific findings of fact where the defendant consents…