From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McCollum

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1921
181 N.C. 584 (N.C. 1921)

Opinion

(Filed 18 May, 1921.)

Indictment — Courts — Omission of Name of Accused — Arrest of Judgment — Supreme Court — Appeal and Error.

Each count in a bill of indictment should be complete in itself, and some name therein be given the defendant, and if no name appears in the bill or in the only count in which a conviction is had, the charge is fatally defective, and the judgment must be arrested, and this will be done though presented for the first time in the Supreme Court, on appeal.

APPEAL by defendant from Bryson, J., at the January Term, 1921, of MONTGOMERY.

Attorney-General Manning and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

R. T. Poole for defendant.


The indictment is for violation of prohibition laws of State, and contains five counts, and the case on appeal states that defendant was acquitted on all of the counts except the count which charged receipt of more than a quart within fifteen days, this being the fourth count in the bill.

There was judgment that defendant be imprisoned for nine months, and assigned to work on the roads of Rowan County. From which judgment defendant appealed, assigning errors.


The record shows that the count on which the jury rendered a verdict does not contain the name of the defendant, or any name whatever. It is very generally held in an indictment consisting of several counts that each count should be complete in itself, and that in order to this some name should be given the defendant. If it is the wrong name, or defectively stated, the question should ordinarily be raised by plea in abatement or motion to quash, but where no name at all appears in the bill or in the only count on which a conviction is had, it is held in this jurisdiction that such a charge is fatally defective, and the judgment must be arrested. S. v. Anderson Phelps, 65 N.C. 450. And this course should be taken though the question is presented for the first time in the Supreme Court on appeal. S. v. Lumber Co., 109 N.C. 860; S. v. Caldwell, 112 N.C. 854; S. v. Goings, 98 N.C. 766.

This will be certified that the judgment on the present conviction be arrested.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. McCollum

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1921
181 N.C. 584 (N.C. 1921)
Case details for

State v. McCollum

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. E. B. McCOLLUM

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1921

Citations

181 N.C. 584 (N.C. 1921)
107 S.E. 309

Citing Cases

State v. Simpson

The name of the defendant, or a sufficient description if his name is unknown, must be alleged in the body of…

State v. Hammonds

The motion is bottomed on the contention that the count upon which she was tried and convicted in the court…