From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1893
112 N.C. 854 (N.C. 1893)

Opinion

(February Term, 1893.)

Indictment for False Pretense — Felony — Omission of Word "Feloniously" — Arrest of Judgment — Motion to Quash.

1. The offense of obtaining goods under false pretense, being punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary, is a felony, under the classification by chapter 205, Laws 1891, and a bill of indictment charging such offense, and which omits the word "feloniously," is defective, and judgment will be arrested on a verdict of guilty.

2. The motion for arrest of judgment on the ground of the insufficiency of the bill of indictment may be taken in this Court for the first time.

3. A bill of indictment for a felony, though defective, should not be quashed, but the prisoner should be held until the solicitor can send a new bill curing the defect.

THE defendant was tried and convicted at Fall Term, 1892, of NORTHAMPTON, before Shuford, J., and a jury.

(855) Attorney-General for the State.

Thomas W. Mason for defendant.


The offense charged is obtaining goods under false pretense, which may be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary. The Code, secs. 1025, 1026. Since the enactment of chapter 205, Laws 1891, defining the line between felonies and misdemeanors, all offenses which may be punished by death or imprisonment in the penitentiary are felonies. The bill is defective as a charge for false pretense, as it omits the word "feloniously," and judgment must be arrested. S. v. Skidmore, 109 N.C. 795; S. v. Purdie, 67 N.C. 25. There is no exception stated for the refusal to grant the motion in arrest of judgment, but that is a motion which may be taken here for the first time. Rule 27 of the Supreme Court. There is an exception to the refusal to quash, but that motion was properly refused. S. v. Flowers, 109 (856) N.C. 841. The judge should have held the prisoner and have given the solicitor opportunity to send a new bill curing the defect. This should not have caused a postponement of the trial to the next term. S. v. Skidmore, supra.

JUDGMENT ARRESTED.

Cited: S. v. Lee, 114 N.C. 846; S. v. Wilson, 116 N.C. 980; S. v. Bunting, 118 N.C. 1200; S. v. Harwell, 129 N.C. 551, 555; S. v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1001; S. v. Stephens, 170 N.C. 747; S. v. Paris, 181 N.C. 585.


Summaries of

State v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1893
112 N.C. 854 (N.C. 1893)
Case details for

State v. Caldwell

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. R. A. CALDWELL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1893

Citations

112 N.C. 854 (N.C. 1893)
16 S.E. 1010

Citing Cases

State v. McCollum

If it is the wrong name, or defectively stated, the question should ordinarily be raised by plea in abatement…

State v. Marsh

This he had a right to do, though no objection on that ground was taken in the court below. S. v. Watkins,…