From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Loesser

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 24, 1997
687 N.E.2d 278 (Ohio 1997)

Opinion

Nos. 95-2439 and 95-2441

Submitted November 5, 1997 —

Decided December 24, 1997.

APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 66762.

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, L. Christopher Frey and Gail Denise Baker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee.

John P. Parker, for appellant.


The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 95-2439 is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of State v. Haught (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 645, 670 N.E.2d 232. See, also, State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766.

Case No. 95-2441 is dismissed on the basis that no conflict now exists.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Loesser

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 24, 1997
687 N.E.2d 278 (Ohio 1997)
Case details for

State v. Loesser

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LOESSER, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 24, 1997

Citations

687 N.E.2d 278 (Ohio 1997)
80 Ohio St. 3d 419

Citing Cases

State v. Gipson

Specifically, in a series of recent cases, we have definitively determined that the requirement in R.C.…

State v. Gipson

Specifically, in a series of recent cases, we have definitively determined that the requirement in R.C.…