rejecting a claim based on the "right to the free exercise of ... religion ... under the Hawaii Constitution" because the challenged law was "a neutral law of general applicability"
Summary of this case from Denis v. IgeNo. 28893.
January 23, 2009.
Summary Dispositional Orders Affirmed.
rejecting a claim based on the "right to the free exercise of ... religion ... under the Hawaii Constitution" because the challenged law was "a neutral law of general applicability"
Summary of this case from Denis v. IgeFull title:State v. Kimmel
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Jan 23, 2009
In Sunderland, the Hawai‘i Supreme Court concluded HRS § 712–1249 (1993) (“Promoting a detrimental drug in…
Marvin v. PfluegerPflueger essentially asks this court to review a decision of the Hawai‘i Supreme Court, i.e., to find Marvin…