From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Francis

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 29, 2019
268 So. 3d 289 (La. 2019)

Summary

finding defendant did not waive delay and therefore, the error in failing to observe the time delay was not harmless because defendant challenged his sentence

Summary of this case from State v. McGinnis

Opinion

No. 2019-K-0227

04-29-2019

STATE of Louisiana v. Rudy FRANCIS


ON WRIT OF CERTIOARI TO FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted in part. Defendant was found guilty of manslaughter in response to the charge of second degree murder. The district court sentenced him to 25 years imprisonment at hard labor without observing the 24-hour sentencing delay required by La.C.Cr.P. art. 873. The district court erred. Defendant did not waive the delay, and the error in failing to observe the delay is not harmless because defendant challenged his sentence. See State v. Augustine , 555 So.2d 1331 (La. 1990). Accordingly, we grant the application in part, vacate the sentence, and remand to the district court for resentencing. Defendant's application is otherwise denied.


Summaries of

State v. Francis

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 29, 2019
268 So. 3d 289 (La. 2019)

finding defendant did not waive delay and therefore, the error in failing to observe the time delay was not harmless because defendant challenged his sentence

Summary of this case from State v. McGinnis
Case details for

State v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. RUDY FRANCIS

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 29, 2019

Citations

268 So. 3d 289 (La. 2019)

Citing Cases

State v. West

[], and no showing or suggestion that defendant was prejudiced," the failure to observe the sentencing delay…

State v. Robinson

The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that failure to observe a twenty-four hour delay is not harmless error…