From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spinale v. Tag's Pride Produce Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2007
44 A.D.3d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Summary

affirming summary judgment for defendants on fraud claim where "any documents that might have been necessary for plaintiff to discover the fraud . . . were in his possession" more than two years before bringing claim

Summary of this case from Standard Sec. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Berard

Opinion

No. 1854 23914/05.

October 30, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered June 7, 2006, which granted defendant-respondent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him and for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his counterclaim for attorneys' fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Linda Strumpf, for appellant.

Bleakley, Platt Schmidt, LLP, White Plains (Susan E. Galvao of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams, Buckley and Kavanagh, JJ.


The action was properly dismissed on the basis of a 2004 release. Moreover, dismissal was appropriate as the action was commenced in November 2005, more than six years after the alleged fraudulent inducement to sell stock in July 1999, and it conclusively appears that plaintiff could no longer reasonably believe that defendant was trustworthy or had his best interests in mind by January 2003, at the latest, when the parties signed their first settlement agreement involving the matters that eventually became the subject of the 2004 release (CPLR 213). By that time, defendant had fully retired, any relationship of trust between plaintiff and defendant was over, and any documents that might have been necessary for plaintiff to discover the fraud alleged herein were in his possession. It also appears that such documents were kept by another employee in plaintiff's office and thus easily accessible to plaintiff even before defendant's retirement, and that plaintiff and his accountant received Form K-1s that should have put plaintiff on inquiry notice of the financial facts he claims were fraudulently concealed ( see Saphir Intl., SA v UBS PaineWebber Inc., 25 AD3d 315, 316). We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Spinale v. Tag's Pride Produce Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2007
44 A.D.3d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

affirming summary judgment for defendants on fraud claim where "any documents that might have been necessary for plaintiff to discover the fraud . . . were in his possession" more than two years before bringing claim

Summary of this case from Standard Sec. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Berard
Case details for

Spinale v. Tag's Pride Produce Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SPINALE, Appellant, v. TAG'S PRIDE PRODUCE CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8108
844 N.Y.S.2d 255

Citing Cases

U.S. Life Ins. Co. v. Horowitz

The parties executed the Settlement Agreement and Release on September 29, 2016. Since plaintiff alleges that…

Standard Sec. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Berard

By the end of September 2001, Berard thus possessed knowledge of facts sufficient to plead the alleged fraud.…