From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sperry v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1976
359 N.E.2d 700 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued November 16, 1976

Decided December 16, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, DOROTHEA E. DONALDSON, J.

Stephen L. Kass and Barry S. Neuman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Henderson G. Riggs, Ruth Kessler Toch and Joseph A. Romano of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 50 A.D.2d 618), except so much of the memorandum as refers to the Statute of Limitations in its penultimate paragraph upon which the court does not find it necessary to pass.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

Sperry v. State

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 16, 1976
359 N.E.2d 700 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Sperry v. State

Case Details

Full title:CORYDON S. SPERRY et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 16, 1976

Citations

359 N.E.2d 700 (N.Y. 1976)
359 N.E.2d 700
391 N.Y.S.2d 106

Citing Cases

Syndicate Building Corp. v. City University of New York

We disagree. While it is true that nowhere in section 10 is a cause of action for the violation of a…

Opn. No. 1979-72

Therefore, the work is not necessary to comply with federal aid highway acts and rules and regulations…