holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to refuse an attorney's request that the Court give the instruction set forth in Bland
Summary of this case from State v. SmithNo. 270, 2006.
January 10, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior 0502000655.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to refuse an attorney's request that the Court give the instruction set forth in Bland
Summary of this case from State v. Smithapproving use of "pattern instruction" that did not include the "with caution" language employed in Bland and Cabrera
Summary of this case from Smith v. StateFull title:Soliman v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Jan 10, 2007
Under these circumstances, there is no basis to conclude that he abused his discretion by refusing to give…
Smith v. StateBordley v. State, 2003 WL 22227558, at *2 (internal citations omitted). See also Soliman v. State, 2007 WL…