From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Virginia

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2009
353 F. App'x 790 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1902.

Submitted: November 17, 2009.

Decided: December 1, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00800-REP).

Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Robert A. Dybing, John Adrian Gibney, Jr., Thompson McMullan PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint and denying leave to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Virginia, No. 3:08-cv-00800-REP, 2009 WL 2175759 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Virginia

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2009
353 F. App'x 790 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Virginia

Case Details

Full title:Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 1, 2009

Citations

353 F. App'x 790 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Va. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

In other words, Rooker-Feldman applies when the federal district court is requested to pass upon the merits…

Joseph v. Maryland

When Joseph has unsuccessfully attempted to allege facts sufficient to state a claim for relief, the Court…