From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Pantoja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 2006
25 A.D.3d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-01325.

January 31, 2006.

In an action, inter alia, to recover on a promissory note, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered December 21, 2004, as denied his motion for summary judgment.

Francis D. Terrell, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Cooper McCann, Elmsford, N.Y. (Gary A. Cooper of counsel), for appellant.

Before: Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment since the defendant failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851).


Summaries of

Simmons v. Pantoja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 2006
25 A.D.3d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Simmons v. Pantoja

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT SIMMONS, Respondent, v. RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 31, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 643
807 N.Y.S.2d 577

Citing Cases

Plainview Water Dist. v. Exxon Mobil Corp

As to the plaintiff's remaining claims - i.e., the first through fourth, sixth and eighth causes of action…