From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shaw v. Park Hill R-V School District

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 9, 1982
630 S.W.2d 610 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

In Shaw v. Park Hill R-V School Dist., 630 S.W.2d 610, 611 (Mo.App. 1982), we dismissed as moot the appeal of a student suspended from school for ten days and suspended permanently from the cheerleading team.

Summary of this case from Consolidated School Dist. No. 2 v. King

Opinion

No. WD 32367.

March 9, 1982.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, PLATTE COUNTY, JOHN M. YEAMAN, J.

Jeffrey B. Tonkin, Kansas City, for appellant.

Lawrence M. Maher, Leigh D. Kirkwood, Swanson, Midgley, Gangwere, Clarke Kitchen, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before NUGENT, P. J., and TURNAGE and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.


Susan Shaw appeals the denial of her petition for relief against a ten-day school suspension levied by Park Hill R-V School District in October, 1980.

In her statement of facts Susan states that she was a senior in October, 1980, when she was given a ten-day suspension from school. On November 3, 1980, she filed a petition in the circuit court seeking an immediate restraining order against her suspension, a temporary injunction and a permanent injunction. The court denied all relief.

In its brief in this court Park Hill states that Susan was graduated from Park Hill High School in May, 1981. Susan does not make any denial of this statement.

This court may notice facts outside the record to determine whether or not the issue presented is moot. Brooks v. Club Exchange Corporation, 356 S.W.2d 555, 557[1, 2] (Mo.App. 1962). Here, Susan states she was a senior in October, 1980, and Park Hill states that she was graduated in May, 1981. These two statements are consistent and absent a denial by Susan, this court finds that Susan is no longer a student at Park Hill.

The only relief sought in the petition was temporary and permanent injunctions against the suspension. The suspension has long since expired, and, in fact, Susan states in her statement of facts that she returned to school after the suspension. The real complaint now is that she was permanently suspended as a cheerleader. Obviously, if she is not a student, she is not now affected by that action.

At this time there is no practical or enforceable consequences of the suspension because Susan is no longer a student at Park Hill. The case has, therefore, become moot. State ex rel. Glendinning, Etc. v. Letz, 591 S.W.2d 92, 95[1] (Mo.App. 1979).

The appeal is dismissed.

All concur.


Summaries of

Shaw v. Park Hill R-V School District

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 9, 1982
630 S.W.2d 610 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)

In Shaw v. Park Hill R-V School Dist., 630 S.W.2d 610, 611 (Mo.App. 1982), we dismissed as moot the appeal of a student suspended from school for ten days and suspended permanently from the cheerleading team.

Summary of this case from Consolidated School Dist. No. 2 v. King
Case details for

Shaw v. Park Hill R-V School District

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN SHAW, APPELLANT, v. PARK HILL R-V SCHOOL DISTRICT, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Mar 9, 1982

Citations

630 S.W.2d 610 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Mardis v. Hannibal Public School District #60

Defendants argue that rescinding the suspension would have "no practical effect" (Motion, ¶¶ 12, 13), but…

Leuellyn v. Director of Revenue

Any action now would not aid the appellant since his license has been reinstated, so there is no practical…