holding that hearsay evidence produced in an affidavit opposing summary judgment may be considered if the out-of-court declarant could later present the evidence through direct testimony, i.e., in a form that would be admissible at trial
Summary of this case from Daughenbaugh v. Macomb Residential Opportunities, Inc.No. 90-1158.
March 18, 1991.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 908 F. 2d 1524.
holding that hearsay evidence produced in an affidavit opposing summary judgment may be considered if the out-of-court declarant could later present the evidence through direct testimony, i.e., in a form that would be admissible at trial
Summary of this case from Daughenbaugh v. Macomb Residential Opportunities, Inc.holding that hearsay evidence produced in an affidavit opposing summary judgment may be considered if the out-of-court declarant could later present the evidence through direct testimony, i.e., in a form that would be admissible at trial
Summary of this case from DeBiasi v. Charter County of Waynefinding constitutional violation sufficient to establish irreparable injury
Summary of this case from Fireside Nissan, Inc. v. Fanningreasoning that the "fruits of [the auditor's] effort belong to his employer," so he could not have "independent knowledge" of the information
Summary of this case from U.S. ex Rel. Fine v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.fingerprinting requirement for political canvassers violated First Amendment
Summary of this case from Ohio Citizen Action v. City of MENTOR-ON-THE-LAKEnoting that "the respondent has presented no evidence tending to show that the requirements of Rule 53(b) are generally not observed in domestic relations cases in Etowah County or that 'routine' domestic relations cases are automatically assigned to Higgins without court orders,"
Summary of this case from Ex Parte MobayedFull title:SERV-A-PORTION, INC., ET AL. v. J.F. FEESER INC. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 18, 1991
Although plaintiff and the moving defendants agree on most of the material facts for purposes of this motion,…
Ringer v. United StatesThe IRS is allowed to make identical assessments against multiple parties under § 6672. McCray v. U.S., 910…