From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serrano v. Riverbay Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 24, 2020
188 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12469 Index No. 28732/16 Case No. 2020-03009

11-24-2020

Joseph A. SERRANO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. RIVERBAY CORPORATION, Defendant–Appellant.

Malapero Prisco & Klauber LLP, New York (Michael J. Driscoll of counsel), for appellant. Burns & Harris, New York (Jason S. Steinberg of counsel), for respondent.


Malapero Prisco & Klauber LLP, New York (Michael J. Driscoll of counsel), for appellant.

Burns & Harris, New York (Jason S. Steinberg of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Oing, Kennedy, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered August 27, 2019, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was struck by an unidentified motor vehicle while he was walking inside defendant's parking garage known as "Garage 1." He testified that the garage did not have speed bumps, pedestrian markings, pathways, or stop signs on its ramps.

Defendant failed to establish prima facie that it maintained Garage 1 in a reasonably safe condition. Its director of parking at the time of the accident testified in general terms about the eight parking facilities that defendant owned and knew nothing about the safety measures in place at Garage 1 at the time of the accident. Nor did defendant submit an expert affidavit that supported its claim that Garage 1 was maintained in a reasonably safe condition at the time of the accident and comported with generally accepted standards at the time it was constructed or thereafter (see Barley v. Robert J. Wilkins, Inc., 122 A.D.3d 1116, 1117, 997 N.Y.S.2d 758 [3d Dept. 2014] ).

Furthermore, defendant failed to establish that it had no notice of the alleged unsafe condition. The parking director testified that defendant maintained no records concerning signage placement for Garage 1 and that he did not know when the area was last inspected for safety, whether defendant performed a search for complaints related to speeding or fast-moving vehicles inside the garage before the accident, or where such information could be found (see Roberts v. United Health Servs. Hosps., Inc., 128 A.D.3d 1210, 1211–1212, 9 N.Y.S.3d 468 [3d Dept. 2015] ; McGrew v. V.V. Bldg. Corp., 306 A.D.2d 131, 761 N.Y.S.2d 43 [1st Dept. 2003] ). Defendant also failed to establish that it was unforeseeable that vehicles were speeding on the ramps inside Garage 1 before the accident. The parking director testified that he was aware that defendant's employees were telling tenants to slow down when they saw them speeding and issuing community complaints for traffic infractions (see Ward v. Ruppert Hous. Co., Inc., 130 A.D.3d 467, 13 N.Y.S.3d 76 [1st Dept. 2015] ; Lucatelli v. Crescent Assoc., 132 A.D.3d 1225, 19 N.Y.S.3d 621 [3d Dept. 2015] ).


Summaries of

Serrano v. Riverbay Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 24, 2020
188 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Serrano v. Riverbay Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Joseph A. Serrano, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Riverbay Corporation…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

188 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
188 A.D.3d 617
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6971

Citing Cases

Petronic v. City of New York

However, it is only a factor to be considered and does not negate the possibility of negligence (seeid. at…