Summary
In Searles v. Manhattan Railway Co. (supra), the plaintiff recovered for an injury to his eye caused by a hot cinder which fell from one of the defendant's locomotives.
Summary of this case from Babcock v. F.R.R. Co.Opinion
Argued February 3, 1886
Decided March 2, 1886
Edward S. Rapallo for appellant.
Lewis J. Morrison for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except DANFORTH, J., dissenting, and RAPALLO, J., taking no part.
Judgment reversed.