Summary
In Gaddy, however, the complaint did not allege that the debtor owed the creditor a debt because of a fraudulent transfer, and the bankruptcy court held that the creditor could not do so because Alabama law does not provide a basis for damages against the transferor of the property.
Summary of this case from Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Hardin (In re Hardin)Opinion
No. 20-1076
04-19-2021
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, as Successor by Merger to Vision Bank, Petitioner, v. Jerry D. GADDY.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.