From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuler v. McGraw Hill Companies

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 22, 1998
145 F.3d 1346 (10th Cir. 1998)

Summary

In United States v. Ankerpont, 145 F.3d 1346, 1998 WL 229606 at *3 (10th Cir. May 8, 1998, unpublished), the Tenth Circuit upheld an $8000 fine based upon the district court's determination that the defendant could pay through the IFRP during incarceration.

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Booker

Opinion

No. 97-2225.

April 22, 1998.

D.N.M., 989 F.Supp. 1377.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Schuler v. McGraw Hill Companies

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 22, 1998
145 F.3d 1346 (10th Cir. 1998)

In United States v. Ankerpont, 145 F.3d 1346, 1998 WL 229606 at *3 (10th Cir. May 8, 1998, unpublished), the Tenth Circuit upheld an $8000 fine based upon the district court's determination that the defendant could pay through the IFRP during incarceration.

Summary of this case from Phillips v. Booker
Case details for

Schuler v. McGraw Hill Companies

Case Details

Full title:Schuler v. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Apr 22, 1998

Citations

145 F.3d 1346 (10th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.

Besides their general policy arguments, neither side provided the court with much legal analysis other than…

Poncho-Alderete v. United States Gov't

And a suspicion, by its very nature, is not a statement of fact.Cf. Schuler v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,…