From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scharf v. Recorder's Court

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 8, 1948
61 A.2d 765 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Argued November 1, 1948 —

Decided November 8, 1948.

Mr. John W. Ockford argued the cause for the prosecutor-appellant ( Mr. Morris N. Scharf, pro se, and Mr. Milton T. Lasher, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the defendants-respondents ( Mr. Romeo R. Napolitano, attorney).


The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Colie in the Court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 7.

For reversal: None.


Summaries of

Scharf v. Recorder's Court

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 8, 1948
61 A.2d 765 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Scharf v. Recorder's Court

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS N. SCHARF, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. RECORDER'S COURT OF THE BOROUGH…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 8, 1948

Citations

61 A.2d 765 (N.J. 1948)
61 A.2d 765

Citing Cases

Verona v. Shalit

The maximum in the ordinance being invalid, the penalty clause is totally void. State v. Laurel Mills…

Rosa v. Borough of Leonia

The court ignored well-established case law that, "where the provisions of an ordinance are separable, the…