From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schafer v. Schafer

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 30, 1966
243 Or. 242 (Or. 1966)

Opinion

Argued February 1, 1966

Reversed March 30, 1966

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County.

RALPH M. HOLMAN, Judge.

REVERSED.

Robert J. Morgan, West Linn, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Ralf H. Erlandson, Milwaukie, and John O. Sheldahl, Oregon City.

Burl L. Green, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Green, Richardson, Green Griswold, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN and SCHWAB, Justices.


This is a suit for divorce by plaintiff on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. The defendant filed a cross complaint on the same grounds and asked for a decree of separation from bed and board. Defendant was awarded the decree of separation from bed and board, the custody of the two youngest children, alimony, child support, and a property settlement. The plaintiff was awarded custody of his two oldest children. From this decree the plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff attempted to call as witnesses Donald Schafer (aged 16) and Robert Schafer (aged 15), children of plaintiff and defendant. The trial court refused to permit these children to testify, solely on the basis they were children of the parties.

There was a conflict in the testimony of the parties and this refusal to permit these witnesses to testify constitutes reversible error. Kreutzer v. Kreutzer, 226 Or. 158, 359 P.2d 536.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Schafer v. Schafer

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 30, 1966
243 Or. 242 (Or. 1966)
Case details for

Schafer v. Schafer

Case Details

Full title:SCHAFER v. SCHAFER

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 30, 1966

Citations

243 Or. 242 (Or. 1966)
412 P.2d 793

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Wallace

Many other jurisdictions that have considered this issue have followed this general principle. See e.g.…

Nichols and Fleischman

" Relying on Schafer v. Schafer, 243 Or. 242, 412 P.2d 793 (1966), and Kreutzer v. Kreutzer, 226 Or. 158, 359…