From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Torah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 2004
10 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2004-02477

September 27, 2004.

Before: Altman, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated March 17, 2004, as denied their motion to strike the defendant's answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion to strike the defendant's answer. The record does not support a finding that the defendant willfully and deliberately failed to produce its witness for a deposition ( see CPLR 3126; Byrne v. City of New York, 301 AD2d 489, 490-491; Cianciolo v. Trism Specialized Carriers, 274 AD2d 369, 370; Vancott v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 271 AD2d 438; Brown v. United Christian Evangelistic Assn., 270 AD2d 378, 379).


Summaries of

Rivera v. Torah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 2004
10 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Rivera v. Torah

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY RIVERA et al., Appellants, v. YESHIVA KOLLEL HARBOTZAS TORAH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 27, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
781 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

Kswani v. Lutheran Medical Center

Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the Supreme Court did not overrule a court of coordinate…

Jenkins v. City of New York

The Supreme Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure, and its determination that the…