Summary
In Reynolds v. Robinson it was held that parol evidence is admissible to show that a writing, which is, in form, a complete contract, of which there has been a manual tradition, was not to become a binding contract until the performance of some condition precedent resting in parol.
Summary of this case from Jamestown Business College Assn. v. AllenOpinion
Argued June 20, 1888
Decided October 2, 1888
Tracey C. Becker for appellant.
E.A. Nash for respondent.
ANDREWS, J., reads for reversal of order of General Term and for affirmance of judgment entered on report of referee.
All concur.
Order reversed and judgment affirmed.