From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 29, 1987
512 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-2176.

September 29, 1987.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Edward D. Cowart, Judge.

Samek Besser and Lawrence Besser, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


Affirmed. Mulvey v. State, 41 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1949); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This case presents the same question certified in Bellinger v. State, 513 So.2d 732 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); and Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987):

IS USE OF THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE TO EXCEED THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR THE OFFENSE PRECLUDED WHERE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE SENTENCE?

Question certified.


Summaries of

Reid v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 29, 1987
512 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Reid v. State

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT REID, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 29, 1987

Citations

512 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Wooten v. State

On the other hand, as in Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we reject the defendant's…

McGriff v. State

Although the supreme court has not addressed the issue raised by the defendant concerning the continued…