From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rahman v. County

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 14, 2007
Case No. C06-5262 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 14, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C06-5262 RBL/KLS.

September 14, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
(2) The motions for summary judgment of Defendants Stephen E. Friedrick, M.D. and C.Z. Andersen, M.D. (Dkt. # 41 and 43) (Dkt. # 42) are GRANTED;
(3) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Stephen E. Friedrick, M.D. and C.Z. Andersen, M.D. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.


Summaries of

Rahman v. County

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 14, 2007
Case No. C06-5262 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 14, 2007)
Case details for

Rahman v. County

Case Details

Full title:KHALID O. RAHMAN, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Sep 14, 2007

Citations

Case No. C06-5262 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 14, 2007)

Citing Cases

Smith v. NaphCare Inc.

The statute “sweeps broadly” and clearly “states that [Revised Code of Washington Chapter] 7.70 modifies…