Summary
holding that female litigants are members of a protected class
Summary of this case from Murdock v. City of WichitaOpinion
No. 95-6255.
February 21, 1996.
Appeal from the W.D.Okl.
AFFIRMED.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Prudential Health Care Plan Inc. v. Lewis
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Feb 21, 1996
77 F.3d 492 (10th Cir. 1996)
Summaries of
Prudential Health Care Plan Inc. v. Lewis
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Feb 21, 1996
77 F.3d 492 (10th Cir. 1996)
holding that female litigants are members of a protected class
Summary of this case from Murdock v. City of Wichitaholding that loan company was creditor rather than "debt collector" under FDCPA
Summary of this case from Shevach v. American Fitness Franchise Corp.upholding dismissal where the plaintiff refused to proceed after the court granted motion to sequester all witnesses other than the defendant's representative
Summary of this case from Lewis v. CavanaughIn Eddy v. Weber County, 77 F.3d 492 (10th Cir. 1996), after the jury was impaneled and opening statements were made, the pro se plaintiff requested all witnesses be sequestered.
Summary of this case from Lewis v. FrayneIn McAlpine v. Kindt, 77 F.3d 492 (Table), 1996 WL 71506 (10th Cir. Feb. 20, 1996), the Tenth Circuit addressed McAlpine's argument that he was entitled to sentence credit for time spent "`confined' to an Indian Reservation."
Summary of this case from U.S. v. VigilCase details for
Prudential Health Care Plan Inc. v. Lewis
Case Details
Full title:Prudential Health Care Plan Inc. v. Lewis
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Feb 21, 1996
Citations
77 F.3d 492 (10th Cir. 1996)
Citing Cases
Vazirabadi v. Denver Pub. Sch.
(1) that he belongs to the protected class, (2) that he applied for and was qualified for the job, (3) that…
Wilson v. Sabatka-RineFurther, a temporary deprivation of a religious item does not rise to the level of a constitutional…