From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Protter v. Brown Thompson and Company

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 19, 1991
220 Conn. 910 (Conn. 1991)

Opinion

Decided September 19, 1991


The fourth party plaintiff-appellant Clarence Butler's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 360, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"When does the statute of limitations commence to run for an indemnity action? What statute of limitations, if any, governs indemnity actions?"

David J. Scully, in support of the petition.

Paul Ruszczyk, in opposition.


Summaries of

Protter v. Brown Thompson and Company

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 19, 1991
220 Conn. 910 (Conn. 1991)
Case details for

Protter v. Brown Thompson and Company

Case Details

Full title:SOPHIE PROTTER v. BROWN THOMPSON AND COMPANY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 19, 1991

Citations

220 Conn. 910 (Conn. 1991)
597 A.2d 337

Citing Cases

State v. Rhodes

What is required instead is proof that the defendant "(1) owned, operated or occupied the vehicle; (2) had a…

State v. Lee

"The court enjoys broad discretion which, absent manifest abuse, an appellate court may not disturb." State…