From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polta v. City of St. Paul Police Dept

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 1, 2006
Civil No. 06-1014 PAM/AJB (D. Minn. May. 1, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-1014 PAM/AJB.

May 1, 2006


ORDER


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated April 7, 2006, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants City of St. Paul Police Department, and Ramsey County Sheriff's Department, is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); and

2. Plaintiff's claims against the other Defendants listed in the caption of the complaint is allowed to proceed at this time, without prejudice to any defenses that those Defendants may later seek to raise.


Summaries of

Polta v. City of St. Paul Police Dept

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 1, 2006
Civil No. 06-1014 PAM/AJB (D. Minn. May. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Polta v. City of St. Paul Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:DALE EDWARD POLTA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL POLICE DEPT., JOHN DOE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: May 1, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 06-1014 PAM/AJB (D. Minn. May. 1, 2006)

Citing Cases

Rosati v. Pine Cnty.

The County argues that dismissal of the Sheriff's Office and PCHHS is appropriate as they do not have a legal…

Fiege v. MEnD Corr. Care

” Tisdell v. Crow Wing Cnty., No. 13-cv-2531 (PJS/LIB), 2014 WL 1757929, at *3 (D. Minn. Apr. 30, 2014)…