From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phoenix v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 15, 1929
112 Tex. Crim. 491 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)

Opinion

No. 12569.

Delivered May 15, 1929.

Transporting Intoxicating Liquor — Arrest and Search Without Warrant — Not Unlawful.

Where appellant was seen wearing an overcoat that was stolen property and arrested, the search following his arrest and discovery of whisky and a pistol in his pockets was lawful, under Art. 325 C. C. P. See also Burkhardt v. State, 83 Tex. Crim. 228, and other cases cited.

Appeal from the District Court of McCulloch County. Tried below before the Hon. E. J. Miller, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor, penalty, one year in the penitentiary.

The opinion states the case.

No brief filed for appellant.

A. A. Dawson of Canton, State's Attorney, for the State.


Conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The owner of a stolen overcoat observed appellant in possession of and wearing said coat. He immediately informed a magistrate of this fact. The latter caused the arrest of appellant, who was at once brought before said magistrate. Search of his person revealed the presence of several bottles of whisky and a pistol. The arrest without warrant was legal. Art. 325, C. C. P.; Burkhardt v. State, 83 Tex. Crim. 228; Parez v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App. 618; Morris v. State, 79 Tex. 141. Under all the authorities one legally arrested may be legally searched. Washington v. State, 296 S.W. Rep. 512; Sandoval v. State, 293 S.W. Rep. 168; Paulk v. State, 293 S.W. Rep. 169; Hawley v. State, 296 S.W. Rep. 556; Coats v. State, 108 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20. The finding of the pistol was part of the res gestae of the search and of the offense and was provable. Appellant was on a public street when first observed on the occasion in question. He was going along the street. When arrested a short time thereafter he had gone further along said street. We think the conviction for transportation of intoxicating liquor, not without support. Objection to testimony of the search and its results was not well taken under the authorities above cited.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Phoenix v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 15, 1929
112 Tex. Crim. 491 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)
Case details for

Phoenix v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PHOENIX v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 15, 1929

Citations

112 Tex. Crim. 491 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)
17 S.W.2d 829

Citing Cases

Yaffar v. State

However, an examination of the holdings of this Court would indicate that evidence of the finding of a pistol…