From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Duane Morris, LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01105-REB-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2014)

Summary

holding that expenses associated with a focus group are taxable if they are reasonably warranted

Summary of this case from Spokas v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01105-REB-MJW

12-12-2014

EDWARD H. PHILLIPS Plaintiff, v. DUANE MORRIS, LLP, JOHN C. HERMAN, and ALLEN L. GREENBERG, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the recommendation concerning costs contained in the magistrate judge's Report & Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Review of Clerk's Decision on Taxing of Costs (Docket No. 127) and Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Clerk's Bill of Costs (Docket No. 128) [#136], filed November 18, 2014. No timely objection having been filed to the recommendation, I review it for plain error only. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted.

"[#136]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the magistrate judge's Report & Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Review of Clerk's Decision on Taxing of Costs (Docket No. 127) and Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Clerk's Bill of Costs (Docket No. 128) [#136], filed November 18, 2014, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That Defendant's Motion for Review of Clerk's Decision on Taxing of Costs [#127], filed October 6, 2014, is DENIED;

3. That Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Clerk's Bill of Costs [#128], filed October 6, 2014, is DENIED; and

4. That the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to AMEND the Bill of Costs [#117], filed September 2, 2014, to reduce the amount awarded for expert witness fees by $57,626.86 to $14,585.66, and thus to tax costs in the total amount of $48,087.10 to plaintiff.

Dated December 12, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Phillips v. Duane Morris, LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01105-REB-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2014)

holding that expenses associated with a focus group are taxable if they are reasonably warranted

Summary of this case from Spokas v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Phillips v. Duane Morris, LLP

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD H. PHILLIPS Plaintiff, v. DUANE MORRIS, LLP, JOHN C. HERMAN, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 12, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01105-REB-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 12, 2014)

Citing Cases

Spokas v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.

Thus, having presided over this straightforward, five-day jury trial, I do not believe that expenses…

Johns Manville Corp. v. Knauf Insulation, LLC

For these reasons courts in this district have not included expert witness fees in awards of actual costs…