From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1999
328 Or. 594 (Or. 1999)

Summary

holding that, where the substance of an omitted witness's testimony was not established in the post-conviction proceeding through admissible evidence, and the petitioner's recital of the witness's expected testimony demonstrated that it would not, in any event, have corroborated the petitioner's defense in the underlying prosecution, the omission did not prejudice the petitioner

Summary of this case from Short v. Hill

Opinion

1999.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1999
328 Or. 594 (Or. 1999)

holding that, where the substance of an omitted witness's testimony was not established in the post-conviction proceeding through admissible evidence, and the petitioner's recital of the witness's expected testimony demonstrated that it would not, in any event, have corroborated the petitioner's defense in the underlying prosecution, the omission did not prejudice the petitioner

Summary of this case from Short v. Hill

holding that, where the substance of an omitted witness's testimony was not established in the post-conviction proceeding through admissible evidence, and the petitioner's recital of the witness's expected testimony demonstrated that it would not, in any event, have corroborated the petitioner's defense in the underlying prosecution, the omission did not prejudice the petitioner

Summary of this case from Horn v. Hill

explaining that "Oregon courts first look to whether there is a material difference between Oregon substantive law and the law of the other forum"

Summary of this case from Portfolio Recovery Assocs. v. Sanders

applying Jones to domestic relations case

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Haggerty

dismissing conditional cross-appeal as “moot” because the affirmance on the appeal obviated any need to consider it

Summary of this case from Lunsford v. NCH Corp.
Case details for

Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1999

Citations

328 Or. 594 (Or. 1999)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles

See ORS 18.005(14) (a money award is "a judgment or portion of a judgment that requires the payment of…

Zygar v. Johnson

" Id. at 106. See also Morasch Meats v. Western Boxed Meats Distributors, 157 Or. App. 253, 260, 971 P.2d 426…