From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 29, 2000
330 Or. 71 (Or. 2000)

Summary

holding that providing the report at least 24 hours before hearing "is essentially a question of providing adequate and timely discovery"

Summary of this case from State v. K.J.B. (In re K.J.B.)

Opinion

February 29, 2000


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 29, 2000
330 Or. 71 (Or. 2000)

holding that providing the report at least 24 hours before hearing "is essentially a question of providing adequate and timely discovery"

Summary of this case from State v. K.J.B. (In re K.J.B.)

holding that a sign posted immediately adjacent to the driveway, which stated, “PRIVATE ROAD NO UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS BEYOND THIS POINT,” was sufficient evidence of the defendant's intention to exclude the public from the property

Summary of this case from State v. Hockema

declining to reverse a civil commitment order because the error was not preserved

Summary of this case from State v. T. C. (In re T.C.)

noting that it is not appropriate for a party to assert a contention in a petition for reconsideration that was not raised in its brief on appeal

Summary of this case from Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc.

discussing trial court's authority on remand, following reversal of aggravated murder convictions, to impose sentence on counts that "had been affirmed but for which no sentence had been imposed due to the earlier merger"

Summary of this case from State v. Ventris

discussing sentencing on previously merged convictions

Summary of this case from State v. Cockrell
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Feb 29, 2000

Citations

330 Or. 71 (Or. 2000)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Belleque

The Oregon Court of Appeals subsequently affirmed the sentences imposed on these convictions and the Oregon…

Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc.

urpose of rehearing is not to raise new questions or rehash old arguments, but to allow the court to correct…