Summary
amending written order to add findings announced in open court was more than correction of a clerical error, because it affected the parties' substantive rights
Summary of this case from Black v. BlackOpinion
1993
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
335 N.C. 236 (N.C. 1993)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1993
335 N.C. 236 (N.C. 1993)
amending written order to add findings announced in open court was more than correction of a clerical error, because it affected the parties' substantive rights
Summary of this case from Black v. BlackCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Citations
335 N.C. 236 (N.C. 1993)
Citing Cases
YAODONG JI v. CITY OF RALEIGH
"`A change in an order is considered substantive and outside the boundaries of [N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1,] Rule…
Watts v. North Carolina Dep. of Envi."A change in an order is considered substantive and outside the boundaries of Rule 60(a) when it alters the…