From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 1, 1999
561 Pa. 650 (Pa. 1999)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding sentencing error on one count in multi-count case generally requires all sentences for all counts to be vacated so court can restructure entire sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Rosario
See 16 Summaries

Opinion

December 1999.

Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation

Ascher v. Pennsylvania Ins. Guar. Ass'n ....... 12/5/1999 56, 57 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 722 A.2d 1078 (1999)

Baby Boy W., In re; In re J.W. ............. 12/28/1999 459 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 216 (1999)

Barrett v. Montemuro ..... 12/20/1999 079 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 736 A.2d 1 (1999)

Berger Montague, P.C. v. Kravitz ........ 12/22/1999 828 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 742 A.2d 1138 (1999)

Bullock v. Byrd; Cheers v. Byrd ......... 12/1/1999 199, 200 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 736 A.2d 677, (1999) 736 A.2d 678

Caroselli v. Franzones Inc. of Plymouth ....... 12/30/1999 869 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 742 A.2d 1138 (1999)

C-Atlantic Waterproofing, Inc. v. Major .......... 12/3/1999 512 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 738 A.2d 1062 (1999)

Com. v. Alexander ........ 12/1/1999 414 Denied Pa.Super., E.D. 742 A.2d 198 (1999)

Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 1, 1999
561 Pa. 650 (Pa. 1999)

holding sentencing error on one count in multi-count case generally requires all sentences for all counts to be vacated so court can restructure entire sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Rosario

holding sentencing error on one count in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing plan on remand

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Daniels

holding that the PCRA court did not abuse its discretion in vacating entire sentence before resentencing, rather than addressing only illegal part of sentence

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Stewart

holding sentencing error on one count in multi-count case generally requires all sentences for all counts to be vacated so court can restructure entire sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Greenlee

holding that, under circumstances, PCRA court did not abuse its discretion in vacating entire sentence before resentencing, rather than addressing only illegal part of sentence

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Baney

holding sentencing error on one count in multi-count case generally requires all sentences for all counts to be vacated so court can restructure entire sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Morrison

holding sentencing error in multi-count case requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Mace

holding sentencing error in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing plan on remand

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Evans

holding sentencing error in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing plan on remand

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Martinez

holding sentencing error in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing scheme on remand

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Darcangelo

holding sentencing error in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing scheme on remand

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Sarver

holding sentencing error on one count in multi-count case generally requires sentences for all counts to be vacated so trial court can restructure entire sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Keefer

holding sentencing error in multi-count case normally requires appellate court to vacate entire judgment of sentence so trial court can restructure its sentencing scheme on remand

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Brown

holding sentencing error in multi-count case requires that all sentences be vacated so court can restructure its whole sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. McMichael

holding sentencing error on one count in multi-count case generally requires all sentences for all counts to be vacated so court can restructure entire sentencing scheme

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Spady

explaining that where this Court's disposition upsets overall sentencing scheme of trial court, we must remand so that court can restructure its sentencing plan

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Strowhouer
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEALS

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 1, 1999

Citations

561 Pa. 650 (Pa. 1999)
747 A.2d 896

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Strowhouer

See Wagner, supra; Byrd, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Bartrug, 732 A.2d 1287 (Pa.Super. 1999), appeal…

Commonwealth v. Stewart

[I]f a trial court errs in its sentence on one count in a multi-count case, then all sentences for all counts…

29 Citing Cases