From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Winkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 1990
161 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 21, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree under the eleventh and twelfth counts of the indictment, by vacating the sentence imposed thereon and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's pretrial motion to dismiss should have been granted with respect to the eleventh and twelfth counts of the indictment. Those two counts "span periods of time extending for 10 * * * months [a] period * * * so excessive on [its] face that [it is] unreasonable" (People v. Keindl, 68 N.Y.2d 410, 419; see also, People v. Beauchamp, 74 N.Y.2d 639; People v. Morris, 61 N.Y.2d 290). We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Winkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 21, 1990
161 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Winkler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT WINKLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 21, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
558 N.Y.S.2d 847

Citing Cases

People v. Watt

1, 1984, excluding weekends) was so excessive that it was unreasonable (see, People v. Keindl, [ 68 N.Y.2d…

People v. Watt

Accordingly, the holding of People v Algarin (supra) does not compel a finding under the circumstances at…