From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vega

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-25

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Reggie VEGA, appellant.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Winston McIntosh of counsel), for appellant.Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Sharon Y. Brodt of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gavrin, J.), rendered October 15, 2007, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter, and the appeal is held in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report. The Supreme Court, Queens County, shall file its report with all convenient speed.

At sentencing, the defendant, in effect, moved to withdraw his plea of guilty. The defendant's right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney, in effect, became a witness against him and took a position adverse to him with respect to the motion at sentencing ( see People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d 957, 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529; People v. Bedoya, 53 A.D.3d 621, 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788; People v. Armstead, 35 A.D.3d 624, 626, 826 N.Y.S.2d 408; People v. Bryant, 22 A.D.3d 676, 677, 804 N.Y.S.2d 347). The Supreme Court should have assigned a different attorney to represent the defendant before it determined the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty ( see People v. Dixon, 63 A.D.3d at 957, 880 N.Y.S.2d 529; People v. Bedoya, 53 A.D.3d at 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter. We hold the appeal in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report. We express no opinion as to the merits of the defendant's motion and we decide no other issues at this time.

RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, DICKERSON and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Vega

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Vega

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Reggie VEGA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7664
931 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

People v. Loaiza

ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the…

People v. Loaiza

ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the…