From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Loaiza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 10, 2016
142 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

08-10-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Aldeberto LOAIZA, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Patricia Pazner of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Anish Patel of counsel; Kristen Lasak on the brief), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Patricia Pazner of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Anish Patel of counsel; Kristen Lasak on the brief), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, and HECTOR D. LaSALLE, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 7, 2004 (Wong, J.), convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and thereafter a report to this Court limited to its findings with respect to the motion and whether the defendant established his entitlement to the withdrawal of his plea, and the appeal is held in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report, which shall be filed with all convenient speed.

At sentencing, the defendant moved to withdraw his plea of guilty. The defendant's right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney took a position adverse to his at sentencing (see People v. Mitchell, 21 N.Y.3d 964, 967, 970 N.Y.S.2d 919, 993 N.E.2d 405 ; People v. Illescas, 126 A.D.3d 915, 2 N.Y.S.3d 916 ; People v. Armstead, 126 A.D.3d 805, 806, 5 N.Y.S.3d 260 ; People v. Vega, 88 A.D.3d 1022, 1022, 931 N.Y.S.2d 883 ; People v. Elting, 2 A.D.3d 455, 767 N.Y.S.2d 828 ). The Supreme Court should have assigned a different attorney to represent the defendant before it determined the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see People v. Illescas, 126 A.D.3d 915, 2 N.Y.S.3d 916 ; People v. Armstead, 126 A.D.3d at 806, 5 N.Y.S.3d 260 ; People v. Vega, 88 A.D.3d 1022, 931 N.Y.S.2d 883 ; People v. Elting, 2 A.D.3d 455, 767 N.Y.S.2d 828 ). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant should be appointed new counsel, and thereafter a report to this Court on the motion and whether the defendant established his entitlement to withdrawal of the plea. The appeal will be held in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court's report. We express no opinion as to the merits of the defendant's motion, and we decide no other issues at this time.


Summaries of

People v. Loaiza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 10, 2016
142 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Loaiza

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Aldeberto LOAIZA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 10, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
36 N.Y.S.3d 487
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5766

Citing Cases

People v. Lopez

The defendant appeals. The defendant's right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney took a…