From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 2000
272 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 18, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered December 7, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.


Defendant's claim that expert testimony by a detective invaded the jury's exclusive province of determining an ultimate issue of fact in the case is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in permitting limited background testimony on relevant aspects of the methodology of street-level drug sales' and that the officer did not express an opinion on the ultimate issue of defendant's intent to sell.


Summaries of

People v. Ray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 2000
272 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE RAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 18, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 295

Citing Cases

People v. Ingram

Thus, a prosecutor may ask an officer to express an opinion as to what quantity of cocaine an individual user…

People v. Quarless

cord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe…