From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Merrill

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1996
87 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1996)

Summary

In People v. Merrill (87 NY2d 948, 949), the Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division, and reinstated the conviction of the defendant, "for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division."

Summary of this case from People v. Smith

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1996

Decided February 15, 1996

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Patricia D. Marks, J.

Howard R. Relin, District Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Wendy Evans Lehmann of counsel), for appellant.

Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender of Monroe County, Rochester (Drew R. DuBrin of counsel), for respondent.


Order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of the facts pursuant to CPL 470.25 (2) (d) and 470.40 (2) (b) for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 212 A.D.2d 987, 988).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK.


Summaries of

People v. Merrill

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1996
87 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1996)

In People v. Merrill (87 NY2d 948, 949), the Court of Appeals reversed the Appellate Division, and reinstated the conviction of the defendant, "for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division."

Summary of this case from People v. Smith
Case details for

People v. Merrill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. JOHN MERRILL, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 15, 1996

Citations

87 N.Y.2d 948 (N.Y. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 587
664 N.E.2d 498

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Considering the matter on the merits, however, on reargument, the defendant's motion insofar as it seeks…

PEOPLE v. COON

Even if the court had found there to be inadequate notice, most of the statements were admissible against…